Year: 2023 | Month: June | Volume 13 | Issue 3

Comparative Evaluation of DNA Isolation Methods from Porcine Semen

Ameya Santhosh Nihar Ranjan Sahoo
DOI:10.30954/2277-940X.03.2023.4

Abstract:

Different biological samples require specific protocols for isolating DNA from them. Semen samples require special considerations because of the presence of protamines in place of histones in the DNA of spermatozoa. An experiment was conducted at the Institute Swine Production farm at ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, to select the bestsuited DNA isolation protocol from porcine semen. Healthy Landrace boars from the farm were given preliminary training and 18 ejaculates were collected from them for the study. DNA isolation was done in three methods in order to standardize and finalize a protocol suitable for porcine semen. The methods were phenol-chloroform as described in Russel and Sambrook (2001) with slight modifications, Chelex-100 (Walsh et al., 2013) and using commercial kit method (Applied Biosystems). The genomic DNA isolated from the porcine semen samples were checked for quality, purity, and concentration. Among the three methods selected for DNA extraction, all gave apparently good quality DNA with purity in the preferred range of 1.8-2.0 but differed in the concentration according to the nanodrop reading. On analysing the results statistically, the modified Phenol- Choloroform technique showed significant variation in concentration of isolated DNA in comparison to the Chelex -100 method and commercial kit method.

Highlights

  • By employing various isolation procedures, the yield and quality of DNA recovered from semen samples vary.
  • For isolating DNA from swine semen, a small modification to the Phenol-Chloroform procedure was shown to produce statistically more effective results.


© This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited



Print This Article Email This Article to Your Friend

@ Journal of Animal Research | In Association with Association of Mastitis

31019862 - Visitors since March 23, 2019